Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Vit Kopriva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W W L
Form
W W W W W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Ficovich 1 - 1 Kopriva
They have played 4 sets in total, with Ficovich winning 2 and Kopriva winning 2. The last match between Ficovich and Kopriva was at the Oeiras 4 Challenger, 14-05-2024, First, Clay with Vit Kopriva getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Juan Pablo Ficovich | 1 |
| Vit Kopriva | 1 |
Oeiras 4 Challenger(14-05-2024)
6
2
7
5
| Ficovich | Stats | Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (21-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (19-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 145 | Ranking | 95 |
| 125 | Highest Rank | 95 |
| 28 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 11 |
| 57% (399-304) | Career Total W/L | 60% (387-261) |
| $322,630 | Career Prize Money | $510,660 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Vit Kopriva
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 20 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:49:12 | Average Match Time | 1:49:12 |
| 54% (70/129) | 1st Serve % | 60% (84/141) |
| 66% (46/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (56/84) |
| 49% (29/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (27/57) |
| 26% (5/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 41% (58/141) | Return Points Win % | 42% (54/129) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Miguel Tobon
50%
(
14 of
28)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Maxime Janvier
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
11
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Rodrigo Alujas
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
82)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Zachary Svajda
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
42%
(
29 of
69)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Vit Kopriva
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Valentin Royer
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Vit Kopriva
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Borna Gojo
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Luciano Darderi
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Calvin Hemery
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (399/304) | Win/Loss | 60% (387/261) |
| 55% (903/726) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (856/657) |
| 52% (8046/7391) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7353/6547) |
| 47% (42/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (87/57) |
| 60% (348/235) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (273/175) |
| 31% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (23/26) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2047 | Aces Total | 1619 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1227 | Total Double Faults | 1669 |
| 1:28:50 | Average Match Time | 1:39:40 |
| 452.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 241.76 |
| 62% (25809/41872) | 1st Serve % | 60% (25267/42046) |
| 68% (17536/25809) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (16542/25267) |
| 51% (8184/16063) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8290/16778) |
| 41% (1836/4426) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2297/4878) |
| 41% (17353/42745) | Return Points Win % | 43% (18512/42738) |
| 37% (7/12) | Slam W/L | 43% (10/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 45% (9/11) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (22/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (176/167) | Challenger W/L | 57% (157/118) |
| 64% (206/114) | Futures W/L | 64% (190/107) |
| 56% (393/696) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (378/635) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (6/8) |
| 48% (98/206) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (79/149) |
| 52% (117/227) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (130/213) |
| 84% (396/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (350/308) |
| 16% (396/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (350/42) |
| 20% (306/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (297/79) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
